We combine polymer engineering expertise with structured environmental assessment. Our foundation in polymer chemistry, formulation design and industrial processing enables carbon and life-cycle models that reflect real behavior and manufacturing constraints of plastic materials. This integration ensures that sustainability assessments are technically realistic, decision-relevant, and directly actionable within product development and production environments.
WHAT WE SOLVE – selected examples
- No established PCF or LCA methodology for complex products or material portfolios, creating uncertainty in emissions baselines and customer reporting readiness.
- Uncertainty in selecting the appropriate carbon accounting and reporting framework (e.g., ISO 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050), leading to misalignment between business model, regulatory requirements and customer expectations.
- Incomplete or inconsistent PCF and LCA calculations due to unclear selection of system boundaries, allocation rules, or end-of-life logic, resulting in conflicting results across customers, auditors, or jurisdictions.
- Scope 3 upstream data gaps and unreliable supplier emissions information, making product-level reporting non-auditable and commercially exposed.
- Sustainability profiling efforts that remain presentation-driven rather than audit-ready, lacking traceable data lineage, documented assumptions, and defensible calculation logic.
- Recycled-content, mass-balance, or circularity claims that cannot be verified due to unclear accounting methodology, chain-of-custody gaps, or evolving verification standards.
- Product-level environmental comparisons that create competitive disadvantage due to inconsistent methodology or non-harmonized data exchange frameworks.
What we do
- Baseline PCF & LCA development
Establishment of structured product carbon footprint (PCF) models according to ISO 14067 and life cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks under ISO 14040/44 or EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF), tailored to complex, multi-material products. - Method selection & framework alignment
Selection and harmonization of applicable carbon accounting and LCA standards (ISO 14040/44, ISO 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050, EU PEF) aligned with regulatory exposure, sector requirements, and customer expectations to ensure consistency and long-term compliance. - Methodology & allocation architecture
Definition of system boundaries, functional units, allocation logic, recycled-content modeling and end-of-life scenarios within the chosen framework to ensure defensible, audit-ready, and non-conflicting results across customers and jurisdictions. - Recycled, bio-based & mass-balance PCF engineering
Development of compliant carbon accounting methodologies and execution of PCF calculations for recycled, bio-based, and mass-balance products, incorporating allocation modeling and traceability logic aligned with evolving regulatory and verification standards. - Comparative environmental performance engineering
Harmonized PCF and LCA modeling to enable reliable product-level comparisons in procurement, OEM qualification, and retailer sustainability scorecards, reducing competitive risk from methodological inconsistency. - Scope 3 data architecture & supplier integration
Structured upstream data acquisition strategies, supplier data validation frameworks, and emissions factor refinement to reduce uncertainty and strengthen audit-readiness - Audit-Ready Sustainability System Design
Transformation of sustainability reporting from presentation-driven outputs into traceable, evidence-based calculation systems with documented assumptions, version control, and verification-ready data.
Typical outcomes
- Audit-ready pcf & lca results
- Standards-aligned carbon accounting
- Structured goal & scope definition
- Defensible sustainability & circularity claims
- Reliable scope 3 data integration
- Comparable environmental performance results
- Decision-ready sustainability metrics
- Â